In the last week, the comparison of leader vs. manager has popped up a couple of times in my LinkedIn feed usually through a quote that implies that it’s better to be a leader than a manager. Here is one as an example, from someone whose ideas I admire:
Management is about arranging and telling. Leadership is about nurturing and enhancing. –Tom Peters
While I am hoping that Tom intended to demonstrate the different skills inherent in managing and leading, it is likely taken by most people as an either or statement. If you are a manager, all you do is arrange and tell, but when you are a leader, the choirs sing and the heavens part as you nurture and enhance your team. Most readers would also take those attributes and assign them by proxy to managers and leaders – because surely it’s better to be a leader than a manager.
But in most companies when do you start being a leader? At some executive title that is slightly higher up the food chain than a mere manager? Can a supervisor be a leader? How about a coordinator? Or a customer service representative?
The good news is that you can do both, no matter what your job is.
Leadership and management are skill sets, not titles.
Managers demonstrate leadership skills every day and not at the expense of “arranging and telling”. Most companies would fall apart without a manager that makes the shift schedules and communicates new policies to their team while creating an environment where people are motivated and engaged.
It is true that the balance tips more toward leadership type work the higher you climb the corporate ladder, but even C-suite executives are still spending portions of their day managing – with performance reviews, asset allocation decisions and directives on new product lines.
So yes, there is a difference between being a manager and an executive and one does tend to do more leadership type work than the other. Both are valuable to the organization – precisely because they do the right amount of managing vs leading.
So let’s add an asterisk to Tom’s quote:
Management is about arranging and telling. Leadership is about nurturing and enhancing.** –Tom Peters
**and you should try to do both well.**
5 thoughts on “Is is Better to be a Leader than a Manager?”
Reblogged this on Prof. Janni Aragon and commented:
I agree. It’s not an either or…the two roles can vary in a day.
Thank you Prof A.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully agree that both management and leadership skills can be needed by the same person. I have found that the best way to separate the two is with these definitions: management is about optimization and leadership is about transformation. Sometimes, the business needs one over the other. And that determines what skill set I should choose in serving as a leader/manager. It’s certainly not anchored to a job title or personality. There is simply good/bad optimization and good/bad transformation. Would you agree?
Thanks for the comment Tim. I do agree that a person’s management or leadership skills are not position specific.
A great leader has the ability to manage and to lead, in certain situations there will be times where it is best to lead, and some times where its best to manage.
LikeLiked by 1 person